Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Staff Contacts | Home RSS
 
 
 

The ‘Court’ and religious liberty

June 28, 2012
The Daily News

EDITOR:Many people in the Christian community are awaiting a Supreme Court decision on the issue of whether this community and its churches and church created institutions like hospitals and schools should fall under Obamacare's provisions. I speak of the use of church/Christian resources in matters of reproductions and abortion, etc.

In 1988 I was a United Auto Workers (UAW) chairman in a large General Motors, "Service Parts Operations Plant" in Pontiac. I was the top union representative of 1,100 employees at a plant that did $1.8 billion of business that year. As a stand alone operation it would have ranked 25th on the Fortune 500 List. At the request of some employees I wrote a case challenging Article III: Sec. 9 of the national agreement which in effect forced employees to sign their children up in the Social Security system by age five or the child's health insurance would be discontinued.

The case was huge and required me to spend much time in the law library researching the Constitution, tax law, Title 26 (1913), the Income Tax Act, Title 42-the Social Security Act of 1935, and many Supreme Court decisions.

After the manipulated election of President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 the central bankers of Europe (the Rothschilds) with their relatives and partners in America took control (long sought after) of our banking system in 1913 and called it the Federal Reserve.

There is no greater system of control of a nation or profit from a nation than loans with interest to a government and the ability to print and create money. The 16th Amendment, the Income Tax Act, Title 26 was brought in the same year to insure collection of taxes to pay the government's debt and interest. The bankers on this side of the Atlantic I speak of are: the Rockefellers, Morgan, Schiffs, Warburg, Kuhns, Loebs, Kahns, and etc.

However, when used to collect taxes on wages, the Supreme Court acted several times to strike down the use of the 16th Amendment in such manner. To remedy this in 1935 Title 42 the Social Security Act was brought into being by the powers that be. This was not done to help people in their old age, etc. But to put those signed up under maritime or admiralty jurisdiction, which is jurisdiction of, among other things: insurance law, banking and corporate law. Title 42: Section 811 converts wages to income along with all forms of remuneration for employment. Those signed up for the Social Security insurance then fall under FICA taxes and income taxes.

In 1921 the central banking cartel started an organization in North America to serve their needs called the Council on Foreign Relations-now with over 4,500 members.

Their headquarters building in New York, N.Y., was provided by the Rockefeller family and David Rockefeller is the leader and honorary chairman of it and the trilateral commission.

The reader needs this background to understand the upcoming Supreme Court decision on Obamacare.

Even though the case was well presented by those representing the Christian community to the court, in my studies I ran across a case that makes me very concerned. The case: 4SS U.S. 252, 71 L. Ed 2nd 127 United States-V-Edwin D. Lee Decided 1982. Mr. Lee was Amish and as such he and others like him had no need or desire to take part in Social Security and it was unnecessary as their religious beliefs required they take care of themselves and each other. Compulsory participation in S.S. interfered with their free exercise of rights.

The "Court" ruled against Lee with some very frightening language. Among such statements was this: "The state may justify a limitation on religious liberty by showing that it is essential to accomplish an overriding governmental interest." Wow! The government, of, by, and for the people, now has interests and objectives of its own-and admits it. The government of, by and for the Federal Reserve Banking cartel. Another concern in the matter is that Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer are both members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). And E. Kagan may be closely related to one and they are Supreme Court Justices.

By the way I had both GM and the UAW against me over this case and included in it was exposed the fact that seven out of 19 of GM's board of directors at that time were CFR members. Others were in associated "think tanks" and trade groups like the "business round table." In 1992 they made their takeover move against GM. Bob Stemple was demoted, and vice presidents Stanly Reuss and F. Allen Smith were forced into retirement. The board was reduced from 19 to 15 and the takeover was complete and not as the news reported it.

I also brought up the fact that after Walter Reuther's untimely "accident" his successor was trilateral commission member Leonard Woodcock who soon after retiring as president of the UAW became the first ambassador to communist China. You know-the place where our jobs and factories went.

The leadership of many of the large unions was corrupted by the bankers but collective bargaining is still needed. After D. Frazer the top UAW leadership stopped being open members due to internal pressure but still cooperated with the CFR/Trilateral groups.

Local note of interest: In 1873 Rio Tinto was acquired by the Rothschilds and partners. The Spanish mining company was the largest supplier of copper to Europe. Now they're in your backyard.

James Haun

Skanee

 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web