No bull: Walleye rebound after Metonga fish cullings

A walleye is shown underwater at Lake Metonga. With bullhead numbers reduced and in better balance with other fish, walleye production in the Forest County, Wis., lake has boomed. (Eric Engbretson photo)

CRANDON, Wis. — Something was going very wrong in Lake Metonga. The 2,000-acre lake in Wisconsin’s north woods had been a successful walleye lake for decades, but by the late 1990s, natural reproduction and walleye recruitment had slowed to a trickle.

To make matters worse, by 2004, the adult walleye population had sharply declined. Spawning habitat was excellent, but young fish, either stocked or natural, were not surviving to adulthood.

Mike Preul, fisheries biologist for the Mole Lake Sokaogon Chippewa Community has been involved with fisheries work on Lake Metonga for 20 years. He took a closer look at the lake to see what changes might explain why walleyes were suddenly having such a rough time.

The fish community in Lake Metonga had always included black bullheads, but now fishermen were telling Preul how often they were catching the small catfish.

“We were doing some routine electro shocking one day and when the stunned fish floated to the surface, all you could see were yellow bellies,” he said. “That’s when I knew there was a problem.”

Black bullheads are shown underwater at Lake Metonga. With bullhead numbers reduced and in better balance with other fish, walleye production in the Forest County, Wis., lake has boomed. (Eric Engbretson photo)

The abundance of bullheads had become more than a nuisance.

“We did some simple math and calculated what a bullhead eats in a year,” Preul said. “They were taking up a lot of space in the system and stressing the available forage for walleye.”

The theory was they were outcompeting walleyes for important forage at critical times when walleyes need an abundance of specific-sized food.

“We knew stocking wasn’t working, so the idea was that if we could create a kind of void, the walleyes might rush in to fill it,” Preul said.

Like many fisheries managers, Preul’s resources were limited, and he privately wondered if this was really a battle he could win. His plan was to create conditions where walleyes could thrive, and that meant doing something about how much of the lake’s biomass was tied up in bullheads.

His plan reversed the fortunes of the lake’s walleyes almost overnight.

In the spring of 2008, Preul began the first of what would become an annual bullhead removal on Lake Metonga. The work was labor-intensive.

“At first we set fyke nets, but the fish weren’t moving into them in sufficient numbers, so the decision was made to electroshock for bullheads.”

The crew worked until their arms ached, shocking and netting the whiskered fish out of the lake. By summer’s end, they had removed 13,337 pounds of bullheads. All the fish were donated to the public, to food banks and to nearby wildlife rehabilitation centers for the feeding of raptors.

Into the newly created void, Preul stocked 5,000 large fingerling walleye.

The next spring, another 6,216 pounds of bullheads were removed and over two million walleye fry were stocked. But this time, something different happened. Substantial numbers of young walleyes survived from the two years of stocking and began to show up and be counted in fall recruitment surveys.

At first there seemed to be no end to the steady stream of stunned bullheads that rose to the surface every time Preul’s crew flipped on the electrodes of his shocking boat. But gradually, fewer and fewer bullheads appeared, and it took longer to fill up the tubs on the boat with fish.

This process became a ritual every spring on Lake Metonga and by 2012 the total catch rate had dropped by 87%. During the same time, the abundance of walleye fingerlings was steadily increasing.

During 2011 there was a large year class consisting of purely naturally reproduced fish. With the resurgence of naturally reproduced walleye, stocking was no longer needed after 2012.

With bullhead numbers reduced and in better balance with other fish, walleye production in Lake Metonga boomed. Eventually, both natural recruitment and adult walleye density reached historic highs.

For Preul, this felt like the kind of victory that fisheries managers too rarely experience. “I won’t lie to you, it was a lot of hard work some days, but the results have been so amazing.”

Today Preul spends only a few days each spring shocking for bullheads. It’s become pure maintenance now, like mowing his lawn.

“As long as they don’t get out of control, I think we’re good,” he said.

Walleye production has its up and down years but has remained reliable overall.

What Preul learned on Lake Metonga could fill a book. His bio-manipulation method of removing bullheads to rebuild embattled walleye populations was later employed successfully on Patten Lake in Florence County.

When that lake’s over-abundant population of bullheads was severely reduced, the walleyes quickly came back in record-setting density.

Keeping walleye lakes healthy and productive is an ongoing issue, and all lakes face their own unique challenges. Overall, there likely aren’t a great number of walleye lakes affected by bullhead populations, but where such lakes exist, Preul’s pioneering work may be a silver bullet that fisheries managers can now add to their arsenal.

Eric Engbretson is a professional underwater photographer in Spread Eagle, Wis. He specializes in underwater images of freshwater fish taken in their natural habitat.


Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)
Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? *

Starting at $4.62/week.

Subscribe Today